Every church should progress. Every church should cling to ideals. And healthy church leadership involves the process of balancing both ideology and progress.
Church leaders should love their communities as much as their churches. Granted, some churches are easier to love than others, and some communities are easier to love than others. A calling to a place, however, requires a love for that place.
Don’t attempt change if you haven’t learned to love the people of the church and the community.
Change is likely to occur when the people within an organization believe the benefits of making the change outweigh the costs of making the change.
I blame senior church leaders for bad church signs and bulletin bloopers. The communication strategy of a church is the responsibility of senior leadership.
While environment and position influence bad leadership, not every case of poor leadership can be blamed on a mismatch. Some leaders are just outliers on the wrong side of the bell curve.
Established churches, in particular, can take comfort in the establishment. Traditions and history can easily become a guise for complacency.
Either people are on board with your leadership or not, right? No; there are degrees of influence and different types of followers.
The vast majority of pastoral roles include management. So, can church leaders be effective if they don’t like management?
Change occurs most smoothly when ideas are simple, standard, and flexible.